NAGPRA suffers surprising proposed budget cut
By Rob Capriccioso
Story Published: Feb 7, 2010
Story Updated: Feb 5, 2010
WASHINGTON – One area of the Obama administration’s proposed fiscal year 2011 budget sticks out like a sore thumb. While most Indian-focused programs are remaining steady or are set to make increases, the National Park Service has proposed to dramatically reduce the amount available for NAGPRA grants.
[...]
Despite the tribal appreciation of the program, the Park Service only requested $1,750,000 for it in 2011. That’s a decrease of $581,000 or 25 percent of the level Congress appropriated for the program in 2010.
The dramatically curtailed request comes at a time soon after the Park Service reported the actual number of grant applications has more than doubled since fiscal year 2008.
The national review committee that oversees NAGPRA-related issues has long been concerned the grants program should not be shortchanged – and it has seen a need to increase, not reduce, its funding. The committee recommended in its 2008 report to Congress that the grant amount be increased to $4.1 million.
So, it is all the more puzzling to tribal officials why the Park Service is trying to cut the program via its reduced budget proposal.
rest at
http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/national/83643187.html
Originally a place for information and tools to protest against UC Berkeley's elimination of its Autonomous NAGPRA (Native American Graves and Repatriation Act) Unit, this site documents what is happening with the collection at the Hearst, and the UCOP Repatriation Committee's rulings.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Topics
- announcement (1)
- California Public Records Act (1)
- forget something? (1)
- Hearings (1)
- Help (1)
- in the news (34)
- Kumeyaay Repatriation (1)
- Letter to Provost Hume (1)
- Letters (3)
- Messages from LF (2)
- NANC news (1)
- News coverage (10)
- Press Release (6)
- State Senate Hearings (10)
- Talking points (1)
- tribal resolutions (6)
- UCOP Repatriation Committee (6)
- What were they thinking? (6)
No comments:
Post a Comment